<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Open Letter to Andrew Matheson in Three Parts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:11:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: risa</title>
		<link>http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>risa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://open.touchbasic.com/journal/?p=50#comment-224</guid>
		<description>ohh embarassing, but I&#039;ve fixed it now. I was all tunnel vision-y, thinking about Megan and not knowing what to say. so i said completely the wrong thing. the opposite of the right thing in fact. classic. sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ohh embarassing, but I&#8217;ve fixed it now. I was all tunnel vision-y, thinking about Megan and not knowing what to say. so i said completely the wrong thing. the opposite of the right thing in fact. classic. sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a reader</title>
		<link>http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>a reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://open.touchbasic.com/journal/?p=50#comment-203</guid>
		<description>risa

I think you slipped up on the name you mentioned in your last post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>risa</p>
<p>I think you slipped up on the name you mentioned in your last post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://open.touchbasic.com/journal/?p=50#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Megan, 
I always knew you were a powerful woman, a beautiful mother, and a lucky lady to have found the one you loved.  The composure you have demonstrated by commenting to this person who cannot see beyond himself and his consumer ways is awe-inspiring.  Your strength and love for your children and husband will carry you through this with a grace that Mr. Matherson will never know.  Our thoughts are with you.  
Stephanie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Megan,<br />
I always knew you were a powerful woman, a beautiful mother, and a lucky lady to have found the one you loved.  The composure you have demonstrated by commenting to this person who cannot see beyond himself and his consumer ways is awe-inspiring.  Your strength and love for your children and husband will carry you through this with a grace that Mr. Matherson will never know.  Our thoughts are with you.<br />
Stephanie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: risa</title>
		<link>http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>risa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://open.touchbasic.com/journal/?p=50#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Megan

I&#039;ve been sitting here for ten minutes now with my hands frozen above the keys and eyes wet and blurry. I don&#039;t know what to say, but I want to say something ... something about how many people have told me they cried when they read this post, or about how dear and good a person &lt;del datetime=&quot;2005-12-14T16:10:10+00:00&quot;&gt;Andrew&lt;/del&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Ryan&lt;/strong&gt; seems to have been ... nothing comes out right or clear or appropriate. i&#039;m just so sorry. i&#039;m so sorry.

thank you for taking the time to write this here. please know that our thoughts are with you. 

risa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Megan</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been sitting here for ten minutes now with my hands frozen above the keys and eyes wet and blurry. I don&#8217;t know what to say, but I want to say something &#8230; something about how many people have told me they cried when they read this post, or about how dear and good a person <del datetime="2005-12-14T16:10:10+00:00">Andrew</del> <strong>Ryan</strong> seems to have been &#8230; nothing comes out right or clear or appropriate. i&#8217;m just so sorry. i&#8217;m so sorry.</p>
<p>thank you for taking the time to write this here. please know that our thoughts are with you. </p>
<p>risa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://open.touchbasic.com/journal/?p=50#comment-147</guid>
		<description>megan,

your participation in this assembly of exchanges – both despite and because of your grief and your anger - has a resonance that i cannot describe. it would be trivial to even attempt such a thing.    

i can tell you that i live just up the street from you and your family and that my partner and i have been thinking about ryan&#039;s death. it has a kind of fall-out effect that relates most immediately to your family and the local community; yet, it goes further into the larger political contexts of the city and the imagined place we want Toronto to become. i was scared that i had pushed discussion too far in a sense, indulging and extracting an argument from an event and a loss that has already caused much pain and trauma. 

i think, though, that ryan&#039;s death was something that demanded a loud and continued response. having attempted to reconcile the situation myself, i felt that anything short of speaking out would have been irresponsible and negligent, at least on my own part. my petty sense of self was affected and had to have a say. i sought out this venue because it is a kind of commons  that i visit frequently and use. i needed some added space to express what it was that i wanted to communicate. i apologize for any inaccuracies; it was not my intent to embellish. i hope you understand.   

i tell you that i am saddened and deeply moved by your comments and that they have caused me further pause for thought. 

again, my deepest sympathy to you and your family.

sincerely,
neil balan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>megan,</p>
<p>your participation in this assembly of exchanges – both despite and because of your grief and your anger &#8211; has a resonance that i cannot describe. it would be trivial to even attempt such a thing.    </p>
<p>i can tell you that i live just up the street from you and your family and that my partner and i have been thinking about ryan&#8217;s death. it has a kind of fall-out effect that relates most immediately to your family and the local community; yet, it goes further into the larger political contexts of the city and the imagined place we want Toronto to become. i was scared that i had pushed discussion too far in a sense, indulging and extracting an argument from an event and a loss that has already caused much pain and trauma. </p>
<p>i think, though, that ryan&#8217;s death was something that demanded a loud and continued response. having attempted to reconcile the situation myself, i felt that anything short of speaking out would have been irresponsible and negligent, at least on my own part. my petty sense of self was affected and had to have a say. i sought out this venue because it is a kind of commons  that i visit frequently and use. i needed some added space to express what it was that i wanted to communicate. i apologize for any inaccuracies; it was not my intent to embellish. i hope you understand.   </p>
<p>i tell you that i am saddened and deeply moved by your comments and that they have caused me further pause for thought. </p>
<p>again, my deepest sympathy to you and your family.</p>
<p>sincerely,<br />
neil balan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://open.touchbasic.com/journal/?p=50#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Not really in the right frame of mind right now to comment as Ryan was my husband but thank you, Mr. Balan. I also just wanted to note that when Lesley referred to Ryan as a &quot;tree planter&quot; she meant he planted trees in our backyard. He was an artist, a postie, a father, a son, a brother, my best friend and husband but not a treeplanter by profession. For everyone&#039;s general information it was 1:00pm on a clear afternoon on the day of the accident, Ryan was a careful and safe bike rider, the police have told me he was in the correct place on the road (he did not ride on sidewalks) and still... . While I may follow any further debates or comments like this, though it pains me to do so, I will not be showing Mr. Matheson&#039;s letter to my kids (who cried themselves to sleep again last night), to Ryan&#039;s parents, to his sister, to his grandparents etc. . I cannot understand the motivations of an individual like Mr.Matherson who would spend time and energy to go out of his way to hurt myself and my family. My husband was not &quot;begging to become a hood ornament&quot;. He was riding the five minute bike-ride home from work to get ready for trick-or-treating with our kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really in the right frame of mind right now to comment as Ryan was my husband but thank you, Mr. Balan. I also just wanted to note that when Lesley referred to Ryan as a &#8220;tree planter&#8221; she meant he planted trees in our backyard. He was an artist, a postie, a father, a son, a brother, my best friend and husband but not a treeplanter by profession. For everyone&#8217;s general information it was 1:00pm on a clear afternoon on the day of the accident, Ryan was a careful and safe bike rider, the police have told me he was in the correct place on the road (he did not ride on sidewalks) and still&#8230; . While I may follow any further debates or comments like this, though it pains me to do so, I will not be showing Mr. Matheson&#8217;s letter to my kids (who cried themselves to sleep again last night), to Ryan&#8217;s parents, to his sister, to his grandparents etc. . I cannot understand the motivations of an individual like Mr.Matherson who would spend time and energy to go out of his way to hurt myself and my family. My husband was not &#8220;begging to become a hood ornament&#8221;. He was riding the five minute bike-ride home from work to get ready for trick-or-treating with our kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://open.touchbasic.com/journal/?p=50#comment-143</guid>
		<description>a few of what were surely many responses to andrew matheson. it&#039;s reassuring to see and hear this sort of polemic reply. so, from this week&#039;s NOW Letters to the Editor :

i.) Share the road, dough-boy
Thanks to NOW for printing Andrew Matheson&#039;s incredible letter (NOW, November 17-23). Most publications would shy away from giving voice to such a callous, wrong-headed screed, but this venom only helps to reinforce what Toronto&#039;s cycling community has been painfully aware of for years - that doughy, irresponsible drivers have absolutely no concern for the health and well-being of their fellow citizens. If anyone should get in the way of their hulking, smog spewing conveyances, they think it&#039;s their right to eliminate the vulnerable impediment. One would hope the sadly misinformed individual who penned this arrogantly dangerous idiocy might be contacted by Toronto police services and edified as to the actual nature of this city&#039;s shared transportation realm as outlined in Ontario&#039;s Highway Traffic Act.
Wayne Scott
Toronto

ii.) Crackpot car-head
Andrew Matheson is certainly not the first condescending car-head to try to blame a dead cyclist by explaining that our roads were &quot;made for... the automobile.&quot; What&#039;s missing from this little history lesson is the fact that Ontario&#039;s dirt roads were first improved in response to lobbying by cyclists. Shortly thereafter, motorists began bullying everyone else off the road and continue to do so today, maiming hundreds every year.
David Tomlinson
Toronto

iii.) Drivers should be nervous
Instead of arrogantly demanding that cyclists give up their legally enshrined right to use the street, automobile proponent Andrew Matheson should be nervous about his own continuing access. Many cities around the world, addressing the congestion, smog and dangers created by automotive traffic, have already imposed restrictions or outright bans on car use in downtown zones while promoting bicycles use, and many more cities are considering doing the same. Dingaling yourself, Mr. Matheson!
Robert G. Cooke, MD
Toronto 


know also that, as i rode the slow but reliable queen streetcar home yesterday, some asshole in a hummer, notoriously passing the streetcar in the curbside lane doing close to 70km/h, whizzed by a guy on a bike and nearly rubbed him out. this happened no further than 400 metres from the site of ryan carriere&#039;s fatal encounter. what&#039;s more is that the driver of the hummer had the audacity to flip the biker the bird. foul.  i was incensed and managed to get into a yelling match out of the streetcar window with the driver once we caught up to him at the street light. it was an awkward moment...what does one do? 

n</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a few of what were surely many responses to andrew matheson. it&#8217;s reassuring to see and hear this sort of polemic reply. so, from this week&#8217;s NOW Letters to the Editor :</p>
<p>i.) Share the road, dough-boy<br />
Thanks to NOW for printing Andrew Matheson&#8217;s incredible letter (NOW, November 17-23). Most publications would shy away from giving voice to such a callous, wrong-headed screed, but this venom only helps to reinforce what Toronto&#8217;s cycling community has been painfully aware of for years &#8211; that doughy, irresponsible drivers have absolutely no concern for the health and well-being of their fellow citizens. If anyone should get in the way of their hulking, smog spewing conveyances, they think it&#8217;s their right to eliminate the vulnerable impediment. One would hope the sadly misinformed individual who penned this arrogantly dangerous idiocy might be contacted by Toronto police services and edified as to the actual nature of this city&#8217;s shared transportation realm as outlined in Ontario&#8217;s Highway Traffic Act.<br />
Wayne Scott<br />
Toronto</p>
<p>ii.) Crackpot car-head<br />
Andrew Matheson is certainly not the first condescending car-head to try to blame a dead cyclist by explaining that our roads were &#8220;made for&#8230; the automobile.&#8221; What&#8217;s missing from this little history lesson is the fact that Ontario&#8217;s dirt roads were first improved in response to lobbying by cyclists. Shortly thereafter, motorists began bullying everyone else off the road and continue to do so today, maiming hundreds every year.<br />
David Tomlinson<br />
Toronto</p>
<p>iii.) Drivers should be nervous<br />
Instead of arrogantly demanding that cyclists give up their legally enshrined right to use the street, automobile proponent Andrew Matheson should be nervous about his own continuing access. Many cities around the world, addressing the congestion, smog and dangers created by automotive traffic, have already imposed restrictions or outright bans on car use in downtown zones while promoting bicycles use, and many more cities are considering doing the same. Dingaling yourself, Mr. Matheson!<br />
Robert G. Cooke, MD<br />
Toronto </p>
<p>know also that, as i rode the slow but reliable queen streetcar home yesterday, some asshole in a hummer, notoriously passing the streetcar in the curbside lane doing close to 70km/h, whizzed by a guy on a bike and nearly rubbed him out. this happened no further than 400 metres from the site of ryan carriere&#8217;s fatal encounter. what&#8217;s more is that the driver of the hummer had the audacity to flip the biker the bird. foul.  i was incensed and managed to get into a yelling match out of the streetcar window with the driver once we caught up to him at the street light. it was an awkward moment&#8230;what does one do? </p>
<p>n</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: risa</title>
		<link>http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>risa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://open.touchbasic.com/journal/?p=50#comment-142</guid>
		<description>this rates super high on my mental list of &#039;intelligent responses to cruel things said&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this rates super high on my mental list of &#8216;intelligent responses to cruel things said&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://open.touchbasic.com/journal/?p=50#comment-141</guid>
		<description>wow. first off, ryan&#039;s death is a tragedy... and yet, it is one that could of simply been passed over--but you intervened, you lit a fire. second, i couldn&#039;t agree more with risa and michael&#039;s comments. third, having been your friend for a few years now, and having grown with you--and watched you grow, i need to tell you that this deconstruction, this making sensible of the insensible and senseless, this majestically ethical riposte is one of the most beautiful pieces of writing that i have ever read of yours. i was moved. it made me tear. what an absolutely precious moment... and it is one that evinces why i miss you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. first off, ryan&#8217;s death is a tragedy&#8230; and yet, it is one that could of simply been passed over&#8211;but you intervened, you lit a fire. second, i couldn&#8217;t agree more with risa and michael&#8217;s comments. third, having been your friend for a few years now, and having grown with you&#8211;and watched you grow, i need to tell you that this deconstruction, this making sensible of the insensible and senseless, this majestically ethical riposte is one of the most beautiful pieces of writing that i have ever read of yours. i was moved. it made me tear. what an absolutely precious moment&#8230; and it is one that evinces why i miss you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.openjournalmontreal.com/testdraft1/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://open.touchbasic.com/journal/?p=50#comment-140</guid>
		<description>r&amp;m:

i appreciate your remarks. know that i was tempted initially to end my response with my phone number and a direct challenge; however, my loving partner, always attuned, instead challenged me to articulate myself in a way that didn&#039;t reiterate any kind of lame posturing. i guess it&#039;s a matter of attempting to generate my own kind of consciousness and get it out there. shit: respecting people who are not in cars - seems like such a simple thing. 

again, thanks.

n</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>r&amp;m:</p>
<p>i appreciate your remarks. know that i was tempted initially to end my response with my phone number and a direct challenge; however, my loving partner, always attuned, instead challenged me to articulate myself in a way that didn&#8217;t reiterate any kind of lame posturing. i guess it&#8217;s a matter of attempting to generate my own kind of consciousness and get it out there. shit: respecting people who are not in cars &#8211; seems like such a simple thing. </p>
<p>again, thanks.</p>
<p>n</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

