Web OpenJournalMontreal.com
 |

The Case for Annexing the Turks and Caicos  by risa

by Foggy Bottom

Canadians live in a vast and inhospitable land. In discussing France’s wars with England over Quebec in the 18th Century, Voltaire once lamented on waste of blood and treasure committed for “quelques arpents de neige.” It is time for Canada to break from the tyranny of cold. It is time that Canada annexes the Turks and Caicos.

The Turks and Caicos (T&C) are an overseas territory of the United Kingdom situated some 300 kilometers north of Haiti and 250 kilometers east of Cuba. The territory is made up of some 40 islands, eight of which are inhabited. The total population of the Turks and Caicos is a small 20,550.

The idea of Canadian annexation of the islands has a long historical pedigree. Canadian Prime Minister Borden pioneered the idea of annexing T&C in 1917. The issue reemerged in 1974 when a MP Max Saltsman introduced a private members bill to study a relationship between T&C and Canada. In 1986, members of the T&C government approached the Canadian government with the view of establishing a special relationship. Polls commissioned in T&C at the time suggested that some 90% of the population favored such an association. The Canadian parliamentary Sub-Committee on External Affairs chaired by David Daubney, released a report soon thereafter concluding that it would be inappropriate for Canada to unilaterally institute formal talks with the T&C given that an election was imminent in the Islands, and Canada could not be seen to be interfering in the internal, free democratic process in another country. The idea of some form of annexation of the island was most recently resurrected in 2003 by MP Peter Goldring, and by the Parliament of Nova Scotia, which extended an invitation for T&C to join Canada.

There are significant costs and benefits at play in the potential Canadian annexation of the T&C. First the annexation of a new territory by Canada would carry significant political consequences. Canada derives considerable legitimacy from the fact that it is not considered a colonial power. The international community tends to see Canada as an honest broker, a friendly third power with friends in high places. Canadian diplomats benefit from a large degree of trust. Such trust, credibility, and political capital could be eroded should Canada annex an overseas territory, albeit with the consent of most Turks and Caicosians. Second, the annexation of T&C would extend Canadian territories in proximity of a politically turbulent region of the world. T&C’s closest neighbors are Cuba and Haiti. Cuba is the last remaining bastion of communism on the continent. While not an expansionist or threatening state by any real measure, its geriatric leadership and economic underdevelopment are fertile ground for political upheaval. Haiti for its part is the poorest state in the Western hemisphere. It has been racked by instability and civil war, and ravaged by disease. The proximity of T&C would act as a magnet for desperate Haitian and Cuban refugees seeking to escape political persecution, dire poverty, and social unrest. Canada could begin to see the influx of refugees similar to which has affected the Southeastern United States. This could test Canadian immigrations laws and put the lives of thousands of refugees at risk on the high seas. Equally important, the defense of the territory would disproportionately strain the already stretched capacity of Canadian Forces and the Canadian Coast Guard. Second, the annexation of the T&C could have significant economic consequences. While T&C benefits from a warm climate, it doesn’t have the lush tropical climate of its Caribbean neighbors. Most of is island is also arid and its soil is unsuitable to most agriculture. As a result, T&C is a relatively poor, with a per capita GDP of $ . The T&C would become a net drain on the Canadian economy - a warm Newfoundland if you will – siphoning funds from richer Canadian provinces for transfer payments and social services such as schools and hospitals. Indeed, there would be little reason to voluntarily cede one’s sovereignty if not to join a prosperous welfare state. Third, there are serious constitutional questions involved in annexation of any territory. Would the T&C join as a territory or as a province of the Canadian Federation?

If the annexation of the T&C has been a perennial Canadian dream it is because it promises a number of important benefits. First and foremost, it would offer Canada a place in the sun. Safe and warm beaches, an English speaking population, and Canadian dollar-based currency would surely attract a larger number of Canadian tourists. Encouraging Canada’s tourism and retirement community to spend its hard earned dollars on Canadian soil (or sand) would ensure keep tourist dollars in Canada. Tourism income would help rectify the economic imbalances between mainland Canada and the T&C. Tourism would also help the federal government to reap tax benefits, cushioning the initial social economic costs of annexation. Over time, the T&C could develop into a platform for Canadian goods on the Caribbean marketplace. From a military point of view, the T&C could provide a strategic foothold for the Canadian military in the Caribbean region, reducing pressure on Canada’s underdeveloped airlift capabilities. This would enable Canada to establish a base for greater power projection. Canada could use this power projection to interdict drug trafficking and piracy, and provide support for its peacekeeping operations nearby Haiti.

tags: No Tags   


10 Responses to “The Case for Annexing the Turks and Caicos”

  1. risa Says:

    hmmm.. i certainly dislike the colonial flavour of this suggestion. i think most country’s are in crappy situations because of their experiences with colonial annexation.. but man, it would be great to be able offer more help to Haiti. Here’s a pretty thorough description of their recent election- just to add some more data to this hypothetical conversation about “the case for annexing the turks and caicos”

  2. risa Says:

    i have to wonder how tongue in cheek this piece is. it seems oddly balanced with a concern for what people would actually want, and what would be most conducive to general peace and prosperity, but still, oy.

  3. skip Says:

    hmmm,

    neocolonialism is not the way of the future!

    Hell, whats wrong with taking those iles off of newfoundland from the french?

    skip

  4. Matt Says:

    I don’t think we should be too concerned with what other nations think. Canada has built on a reputation for the last 100 years and I don’t really see to much damage being done with the anexation of a willing population. Pretty sure the plus side wins in this debate. Canada is one wealthy nation, lets form a partnership with T & C and get on with it.

  5. risa Says:

    do we really have to annex them? can’t we sort of team up in some mutually beneficial buddy system type of way without getting tangled up in the trickyness of a powerposition over an independent and not-so-physically-nearby democracy? can’t we look further into creative collaborations, beyond wanting to sit around on their beaches and have their people serve us fancy drinks? this is something that always bugs me: why don’t we have more peacekeeping efforts that involve art making, and less that involve happy fatcats passing their benificience down to needy natives? lets team up and collectivey author some theatre together, or some code, and record the process with teams of camera people from the T&C and Canada, and edit it in studios there and here into tv about the trickyness and joys of international collaboration, and hire leadership consultants to watch and translate the process into useful whitepapers on how to make the most peace and properity-oriented use out of the moments of connection. i agree, let’s form partnerships and get on with it, but maybe we could try to learn from the shitloads of mistakes that have gone into our cross border relationships before?

    which brings me to another angry/utopian tirade- if we can author code together, which is super complicated relationships mapped out, why can’t we author peace treaties together? is it just me or does it seem like the more things escalate in a confrontation, the fewer subtle voices get heard, and the stupider things get?

  6. Rob Says:

    Why the heck would the T&C want to join Canada? Do they really want official bilingualism, Canadian government bureaucracy (which the folk in Ottawa have raised to the level of an art form), our terrible Medicare system and our taxes (which amount to extrortion)? The people of T&C already have a much better partner in Britain to look after interests such as Foreign Affairs and Defence.

    Also coveting the T&C and talking of annexing them is a grave discourtesy to the United Kingdom, whose overseas territory it is.

    Those Canadians advocating this should be ashamed of themselves and those gullible T&C people supporting this (who I suspect could probably fit in a small closet)should be careful what they wish for.

  7. Robert Says:

    Oh goodness why not….it’s not bad if both people want it…i know marriages where neither wanted it! ;)

    Go for it, why not! :P

  8. ty Says:

    Canada should conduct a Royal commision into the matter. Also mutal consent should be up to the of the people of T&C as well , in wheather they want to join Canada. Personally I think this is a good idea because it will bring more tourism to Canada; especially with migration and not having to have a passport. As for T&C they would have better representation from Canada than the United Kingdom at an international level. Even fellow commonwealth nation New Zealand has an assosiation with the Cook islands and they are not deemed as a colonial super power– so why not Canada with T&C? Besides with the exception of marine - rainy winters of Vancouver and Victoria winter in Canada can be bittery cold.

  9. Thorn Says:

    While I don’t think annexation is the way to go. I do believe that T&C should be invited to join Canada. The benefits easily out weigh the cons. I would love to retire there and still be in Canada.

  10. Paul Andrews Says:

    What Are we kidding! To be able to fly to a tropical county and not be in the 3rd worlds with all of its restrictions.
    In the GTA (toronto) we could absolve the whole population and never notice it.
    Oh Yes Everyone speaks English.

    What idiots are opposed to this and if they are in any of out governments plkease supply their names so we can have them removed indefinitely.

Leave a Comment







Text Link Ads

^ top ^